Embed
Email

P00 - Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation[138]

Document Sample
P00 - Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation[138]
Shared by: winstongamso
Stats
views:
5
posted:
8/22/2009
language:
English
pages:
23
P00

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation





Operating Budget Data

($ in Thousands)



FY 02-04 FY 04-05

FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 Change FY 05 Change

Operations $102,510 $103,691 $101,606 -$905 $110,674 $9,068

Contractual Services 10,605 11,550 12,102 1,497 16,807 4,705

Grants 58,342 71,103 64,904 6,562 53,426 -11,478

FY 2004 Deficiencies 0 0 6,000 6,000 0 -6,000

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 0 0 -556 -556

Adjusted Grand Total $171,457 $186,345 $184,611 $13,154 $180,350 -$4,261



General Funds 28,390 29,131 18,769 -9,621 18,418 -351

FY 2004 Deficiencies 0 0 6,000 6,000 0 -6,000

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 0 0 -88 -88

Adjusted General Funds $28,390 $29,131 $24,769 -$3,621 $18,330 -$6,439



Special Funds 7,642 12,384 20,390 12,748 20,092 -298

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 0 0 -61 -61

Adjusted Special Funds $7,642 $12,384 $20,390 $12,748 $20,031 -$359



Federal Funds 135,425 142,426 135,713 288 139,586 3,873

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 0 0 -407 -407

Adjusted Federal Funds $135,425 $142,426 $135,713 $288 $139,179 $3,466



Reimbursable Funds 0 2,404 3,740 3,740 2,811 -929



Adjusted Grand Total $171,457 $186,345 $184,611 $13,154 $180,350 -$4,261



Annual %Change 8.7% -0.9% -2.3%



! Between fiscal 2002 and 2004 the department reduced its general fund appropriation by

$3.6 million. Part of this was due to the transferring of several programs from general funds to

special funds, which also partially explains the increase in special funds, and part was due to PIN

reductions.









Note: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.

For further information contact: Brian Baugus Phone: (410) 946-5530



Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

1

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



! The fiscal 2005 allowance provides a $6,000,000 general fund deficiency appropriation for

fiscal 2004. The deficiency is requested to offset inappropriate charges to federal funds in prior

years.



! The fiscal 2005 allowance provides a $16.6 million increase to the Unemployment Insurance

Program.



! The fiscal 2005 allowance assumes a reduction of $13.9 million in federal Workforce Investment

Act funds.





Personnel Data

FY 02-04 FY 04-05

FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 Change FY 05 Change

Regular Positions 1,706.0 1,627.0 1,519.1 -186.9 1,502.1 -17.0

Contractual FTEs 176.2 113.7 159.3 -16.9 178.6 19.3

Total Personnel 1,882.2 1,740.7 1,678.4 -203.8 1,680.7 2.3



Vacancy Data: Regular Positions



Turnover Expectancy 57.68 3.84%

Positions Vacant as of 12/31/03 66.60 4.38%



! The department has deleted 187 regular positions since fiscal 2002. These reductions have

affected every division in the department.



! The fiscal 2005 allowance deletes 17 filled regular positions due to a reorganization in the job

services program.



! The fiscal 2005 allowance provides 19.32 new contractual positions.









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

2

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Analysis in Brief

Major Trends

Customer Satisfaction Not Improving: The Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation

(DLLR) measures customer and user satisfaction for many of its programs, and the recent trends in

these measures are flat across the department.



The Commissioner of Financial Regulation Lowers Its Depository Institutions Goals: Various

measures of the strength of the State’s depository institutions are declining.



Downward Trends in Office of Employment Training: A broad range of measures for the Office of

Employment Training have been trending downward over the past few years.





Issues

Financial Reconciliation: DLLR has made progress on its long running audit issues but has not

solved a major underlying problem.



Jobs Services: DLLR is the primary provider of federally funded job and employment services.

These programs are often redundant and overlapping in both the services they deliver and the market

they seek to serve.





Recommended Actions

Funds



1. Add budget bill language to reduce general funds contingent on

legislation making two boards special funded.



2. Reduce education expenses in Office of Professional Licensing. $ 20,000



3. Reduce funding for the Russian Immigrant Program. 75,000



4. Reduce federal funds. 2,998,000



5. Delete overbudgeted funds in the Unemployment Insurance 468,000

Program.



Total Reductions $ 3,561,000







Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

3

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

4

P00

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Operating Budget Analysis

Program Description



The Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (DLLR) includes many of the State’s

agencies and boards responsible for licensing and regulating various businesses, professions, and

trades. The department also administers a variety of federal funded employment service programs.

In addition to the Office of the Secretary, the department has six operating divisions:



! The Division of Labor and Industry is responsible for safety inspections of boilers, elevators,

amusement rides, and railroads. It also enforces certain protective labor laws and administers the

Maryland Occupational Safety and Health Act.



! Division of Workforce Development operates workforce development programs including job

services, Workforce Investment Act, and labor market information programs.



! Division of Unemployment Insurance operates the federally funded unemployment insurance

programs including paying benefits, collecting unemployment taxes and the Trade Adjustment

Assistance programs.



! The Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing works with 23 different boards and

commissions to license, regulate, and monitor a wide variety of professions and trades. All but

seven boards are supported by the general fund. For one of the seven special fund boards,

unspent money reverts to the general fund.



! The Division of Racing regulates thoroughbred and harness racing at tracks across the State.

Responsibilities include assigning racing days, regulating wagering on races, collecting the

wagering tax, licensing all race track employees, and operating a testing laboratory. The division

also pays the salaries and stipends of all racetrack employees who are appointed by the State

Racing Commission.



! The Division of Financial Regulation regulates commercial banks, trust companies, credit

unions, mortgage lenders, collection agencies, and consumer loan companies.



Each division has its own set of goals and objectives based on its mission, but the department’s

general goals are to:



! provide a worker safety net, protect workers’ rights, and foster work force development;



! improve workplace safety and worker health;



! prevent injuries and save lives of people using railroads, boilers, escalators, pressure vessels, and

amusement rides;





Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

5

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



! assure the basic competence and regulation compliance of occupational and professional

licensees;



! maintain the integrity of the horse racing industry; and



! protect consumers of financial services.





Performance Analysis: Managing for Results



Customer Satisfaction Not Improving



DLLR has a broad range of programs and responsibilities, making it difficult to summarize its

performance with a few concise measures from the Managing for Results (MFR) report. However,

one indicator of DLLR’s mission accomplishment is the customer/client satisfaction surveys it

conducts for many of its programs. Exhibit 1 details the recent fiscal years (when available) and

fiscal 2005 estimates of survey results.



Exhibit 1 gives an overall measure of the department and how it is perceived in fulfilling many of

its duties. Most measures are relatively flat over the years. While one way to view these numbers is

that DLLR is very consistent, none of these measures indicate exemplary service. Several are barely

meeting the department’s stated goal for the particular measure, and only one measure scores over a

nine in four years.



DLLR can literally count hundreds of thousands of Marylanders as part of its customer base – job

seekers, employers, professionals, and riders of amusement rides and trains are only a few of the

groups DLLR affects.



DLLR should comment on whether it views these results as an acceptable level of

performance or if it has plans to improve its satisfaction ratings.





The Commissioner of Financial Regulation Lowers Its Depository Institutions Goals



The Commissioner of Financial Regulation has lowered its stated goals in its MFR. The

commissioner has lowered the number of depository institutions it expects to give a strong one or two

composite score. The composite score is a rating system developed by the Federal Financial

Institutions Council called the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating Systems (UFIRS). The UFIRS

measures an institution’s strength in the following six essential areas:



• adequacy of capital;



• quality of assets;





Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

6

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









Exhibit 1

Customer and User Satisfaction Levels with Various DLLR Programs

Fiscal 2002 – 2005 Estimates



(Est.) (Est.)

Program FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005



Usefulness of Program – Office of Program Analysis and Audit

(Goal: 7.0) 8.17 7.21 7.30 7.50

Satisfaction – Appeals Division (Goal: 5% increase each year) 5.39 5.52 5.67 5.80

Satisfaction – Office of Personnel Services (Goal: 7.75) 7.69 n/a 7.75 7.85

Employer Satisfaction – Employment Standards and Services

(Goal: 7.5) 7.24 7.30 7.50 7.50

Employee Satisfaction – Employment Standards and Services

(Goal: 7.5) 7.74 8.00 7.50 7.50

Program Sponsor Satisfaction – Maryland Apprenticeship and

Training (Goal: 8.0) 8.33 8.23 8.00 8.00

Participant Satisfaction – Maryland Apprenticeship and

Training (Goal: 8.5) 8.89 9.00 8.50 8.50

Satisfaction with Complaint Process – Occupational and

Professional Licensing (Goal: 7.3) 7.30 7.20 7.30 7.30

Business Satisfaction with Office of Employment Services

Workforce Development (Goal: 6.0) n/a 6.83 6+ 6+

Job Seeker Satisfaction with Office of Employment Services

Workforce Development (Goal: 6.0) n/a 6.99 6+ 6+

Satisfaction – Office of Unemployment Services (Goal: 6.0) 8.82 8.71 6+ 6+



All scales are 1 to 10 with 10 being best.



Source: Governor’s Budget Books







• capacity of management;



• level of earnings;



• adequacy of liquidity; and



• sensitivity to market risk.







Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

7

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



An institution’s composite score is not a mathematical average of its rating in the individual

categories but more of a qualitatively adjusted weighted average. If a certain component seems to be

more important to a particular institution (i.e., an exceptionally strong management team) that

component is given more weight in the composite of that particular institution.



The commissioner’s goals show an expectation that fewer poor performing institutions will

improve their outcomes. The commissioner also expects to complete examinations for only half of

the institutions scheduled for an audit. Exhibit 2 presents the details.





Exhibit 2

Selected Measures from the Commissioner of Financial Regulation

Fiscal 2002 – 2005 Estimates



(Est.) (Est.)

Measure FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005



% of depository institutions rated above two* 90% 93.5% 85% 85%

% of depository institutions rated above three

that are expected to improve* 100% 50% 25% 25%

Scheduled exams 52 61 63 65

Completed exams 63 64 34 34

Number of complaints filed 2,964 3,610 3,610 3,610



* Target score is a one or two.



Source: Governor’s Budget Books







The decline in completed exams could be the result of understaffing. It is noted that in a separate

research project during the 2003 interim, the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) determined

that the commissioner is about seven examiners short of having the labor-hour capacity to complete

the required examinations within the designated amount of time.



The department should explain the cause of these trends, their significance to the financial

services industry in Maryland, and the department’s need to complete its audits.





Downward Trends in Office of Employment Training



Exhibit 3 presents a variety of measures from the MFR report for the Office of Employment

Training. Most of them show a downward trend.







Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

8

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









Exhibit 3

Selected Measures for the Office of Employment Training

Fiscal 2002 – 2005 Estimates



(Est.) (Est.)

Measure FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005



Entered employment rate (older youth) 60.1% 76.1% 65.0% 65.0%

Entered employment rate (dislocated workers) 95.2% 91.0% 75.0% 75.0%

Employment retention rate (older youth) 89.5% 87.3% 78.0% 78.0%

Employment retention rate (adults) 96.8% 91.9% 82.0% 82.0%

Employment retention rate (dislocated workers) 98.1% 95.6% 88.0% 88.0%



Note: “Entered employment” is the number of people who complete a job training program and obtain a job.

“Retention” is a measure of how many who find a job, keep it for six months.



Source: Governor’s Budget Books







There may be several reasons for these trends: the target population may be a harder to employ

demographic than in previous years or it could be that the slower economy has made it more difficult

to find employment for the lower-skilled. Regardless of the cause, fewer program participants (as a

percentage) are entering the workforce, and fewer of those are being retained longer than six months.



DLLR should be prepared to explain these trends, their significance, and what is required

to reverse them.





Fiscal 2004 Actions



Proposed Deficiency



The budget contains a $6,000,000 deficiency request. This deficiency is requested as a one-time

offset against the federal fund shortfalls the department has incurred over the past seven fiscal years.





Impact of Cost Containment



As a result of the Board of Public Works action in July 2003, DLLR took cost containment

actions totaling $1.19 million. The department achieved these reductions by the allocation shown in

Exhibit 4.







Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

9

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









Exhibit 4

Allocation of Board of Public Works Cost Containment

Fiscal 2004



FY 2004

Action Savings



Reduce STEP Program $500,000

Eliminate vacant positions/maintain other vacant positions 421,633

New hires at lower salaries 70,000

Fund switch – DLLR is using special funds in lieu of general funds in the

Division of Labor and Industry 200,000

Total $1,191,633



STEP = Skills-based training for employment promotion



Source: Department of Budget and Management









Governor s Proposed Budget

=





Exhibit 5 presents the details of the Governor’s fiscal 2005 allowance. DLLR’s allowance

decreases by $4.3 million (2.3%) over the fiscal 2004 working appropriation. However, this decrease

is somewhat misleading, inasmuch as most of the changes are focused in a few programs.





Impact of Cost Containment



DLLR has eliminated the Skills-based Training for Employment Promotion (STEP) program from

the fiscal 2005 allowance, which represents a $500,000 decrease. Other ongoing cost containment

actions include an increase in turnover ($241,000), rent reductions ($273,000), PIN reductions

($223,000), and $769,000 in departmental wide reductions.





Personnel



The fiscal 2005 allowance provides a $1.3 million increase over the fiscal 2004 working

appropriation for personnel. This increase is a function of several factors. The single largest increase

in personnel is $1.2 million in increments, but there are also significant increases in health insurance

($1.1 million), turnover ($948,000), and job reclassifications in the UI Program ($922,000).







Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

10

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









Exhibit 5

Governor's Proposed Budget

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation

($ in Thousands)



FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 04-05 FY 04-05

Actual Approp. Allowance Change % Change



General Funds $29,131 $18,769 $18,418 -$351 -1.9%

FY 2004 Deficiencies 0 6,000 0 -6,000

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 -88 -88

Adjusted General Funds $29,131 $24,769 $18,330 -$6,439 -26.0%



Special Funds $12,384 $20,390 $20,092 -$298 -1.5%

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 -61 -61

Adjusted Special Funds $12,384 $20,390 $20,031 -$359 -1.8%



Federal Funds $142,426 $135,713 $139,586 $3,873 2.9%

Contingent & Back of Bill Reductions 0 0 -407 -407

Adjusted Federal Funds $142,426 $135,713 $139,179 $3,466 2.6%



Reimbursable Funds $2,404 $3,740 $2,811 -$929 -24.8%



Adjusted Grand Total $186,345 $184,611 $180,350 -$4,261 -2.3%



Where It Goes:

Personnel Expenses

Increments and other compensation....................................................................... $1,228

Employee and retiree health insurance .................................................................. 1,108

Turnover and cost containment adjustments .......................................................... 948

Increase in federal funds due to reclassification of claims examiners in the UI

Program ................................................................................................................ 922

Reduction in funds related to 39 PINs deleted in fiscal 2004 by the Board of

Public Works ........................................................................................................ -1,702

Abolition of 17 positions....................................................................................... -955

Retirement ............................................................................................................ -135

Other fringe benefit adjustments............................................................................ -65





Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

11

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Where It Goes:



Other Changes

UI Program

Increase in federal grants for the Information Technology Service Centers to

develop information technology applications for the processing and monitoring of

unemployment insurance data ............................................................................... 4,800

Contractual fees for programming services, system upgrades, and work stations

for the Maryland Imaging Data Access System (MIDAS) ..................................... 6,241

Purchase 300 personal computers, 76 laptop computers, 2 printers, and various

other technological equipment............................................................................... 1,332

Purchase of office equipment and data processing hardware.................................. 1,025

Increase in licenses for forms processing, scanning, and workflow software ......... 973

Increase in phone and communication expenses .................................................... 785

Computer upgrades ............................................................................................... 727

Printing expenses for pamphlets, literature, etc...................................................... 211

Contractual payroll for seasonal staff at offices around the State ........................... 122

Maintenance for current imaging system until new one is operational ................... 108

Rental costs of copiers and postage machines........................................................ 101

Numerous small repairs to offices around State and travel..................................... 130



Racing Commission

Decrease in grants, uncashed ticket revenues, previously channeled through the

Maryland Economic Development Corporation and back to the racing

commission........................................................................................................... -2,168



Division of Workforce Development

Increase to replace data processing equipment per departmental schedule ............. 131

Increase in funding for Workforce Investment Board Coordination agreements..... 65

Decrease in grants due to a reduction in the federal appropriation for WIA ........... -13,900

Decrease in expenditure on Mid-Atlantic Career Consortium ................................ -175

One-time decrease in data processing contracts related to web site work for the

Mid-Atlantic Career Consortium ........................................................................... -450

Decrease in software upgrade expenses ................................................................. -68









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

12

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Where It Goes:



Division of Administration

Increase in State computer usage for various programs.......................................... 199

Elevator maintenance, security locks, and building maintenance ........................... 60

Departmental reductions in rent paid to the Department of General Services ......... -545

Decrease in software licenses ................................................................................ -136



Miscellaneous Changes

Department of Budget and Management telecommunications charges................... 724

Rental for copiers, postage machines, and office cleaning equipment .................... 90

Communication expenses for programs other than UI ........................................... 48

Decrease due to one time deficiency in fiscal 2004................................................ -6,000

Replacement computers, printers, and monitors mostly for the Occupational

Safety program and Financial Regulation.............................................................. -109



Other ........................................................................................................................... 69



Total -$4,261



Note: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.







These increases are offset by a few significant decreases as well. The largest decrease is the

deletion of funds associated with 39 PINs that were deleted in previous cost containment actions.

The other large decrease in personnel is the abolishment of 17 PINs. These are currently filled

positions and represent layoffs the department is making as part of reorganization of its Division of

Workforce Development. Exhibit 6 presents the details of these positions.









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

13

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









Exhibit 6

Abolished PINs in the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation’s

Fiscal 2005 Allowance

Program Position Salary



Office of Employment Services Administrator I $50,535

Administrator III 59,358

Administrator I 45,029

Office Secretary III 33,814

Administrative Officer III 47,779

Administrative Officer III 47,779

Administrative Officer II 40,656

Administrator I 51,027

Management Specialist IV 48,627

Office Secretary I 27,291





Office of Employment Training Agency Grants Specialist II 48,238

Administrator II 46,287

Administrator II 55,564

Administrator II 55,027

Administrative Specialist II 36,428

Administrative Specialist I 32,863

Administrator II 55,564

Total $781,866



Source: Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation









UI Program



The changes to the UI Program dominate DLLR’s fiscal 2005 allowance. While the total fiscal

2005 allowance decreases by 2.3%, the UI Program increases by 42.8% ($16.6 million) over the

fiscal 2004 working appropriation and 16.4% over the fiscal 2003 actual expenditures, all in federal

funds. Almost all of this increase is driven by large scale technology acquisitions. The largest item

the UI Program plans to purchase is a new imaging system. The department reports that the

Maryland Imaging Data Access System was created in 1995, and its technology is no longer





Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

14

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



supported. DLLR reports that the new system is needed to maintain reliability, speed, and

serviceability.



In addition to the imaging system, the UI Program also plans to purchase 370 new computers, a

variety of data processing equipment, and software upgrades for 540 personal computers.





Division of Workforce Development



The Workforce Development Program decreases by $14.4 million. This is almost entirely due to

the reduction the federal government has made to the WIA. Maryland’s WIA grant is $13.9 million

less than it was in (State) fiscal 2004. This reduces the amount of funds that will be passed through to

the local workforce development programs. It is expected that this reduction will result in less job

training and employment services.





Other Changes



Significant decreases in other programs include a $2.2 million reduction in the facility

redevelopment fund of the racing commission and a $545,000 decrease in rent. These reductions, in

addition to the elimination of the $6 million deficiency for fiscal 2004 and the reductions in the

division of workforce development, offset the increase in the UI Program.









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

15

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Issues

1. Financial Reconciliation

As has been noted in a variety of DLS’ documents over the past few years, DLLR has had

significant problems managing and reconciling its federal funds. In the Statewide Review of Budget

Closeout Transactions for Fiscal Year 2003, released in January 2004, the Office of Legislative

Audits reported that DLLR recorded $5.9 million in unsubstantiated federal funds. This is a

continuation of a previously reported finding of $17.3 million in unsubstantiated federal funds

recorded in fiscal 2001. In negotiations since 2001 with the U.S. Department of Labor, DLLR was

able to reduce the amount from $17.3 million to $7.8 million (as reported in the 2003 session). The

balance is now a non-negotiable $5.9 million. DLLR proposes to address the remaining balance with

a fiscal 2004 deficiency appropriation provided in the fiscal 2005 allowance.



Of DLLR’s other major audit issues, the department was able to reconcile the $19.9 million in

un-reverted federal funds with a plan approved by the budget committees, and the department was

able to reconcile its $9.8 million in disallowed indirect costs reimbursements with the U.S.

Department of Labor.



This leaves one audit issue yet unresolved: the improper use of $4.7 million of Special

Administrative Expense Funds. DLLR, upon advice of counsel, maintains that it used these funds in

accordance with the law while DLS, also upon the advice of counsel, respectfully disagrees.

Resolution of this issue is pending an Attorney General’s opinion.



DLLR has made progress on its audit issues and obtained more training for its staff regarding

federal funds management, but one fundamental problem remains – DLLR has not developed a

reliable way to reconcile its federal funds to R*STARS, the State accounting system. DLLR

conducted its most recent reconciliation by hand. This is a most difficult way to manage and track

$140 million and is prone to error. Improper reconciliation may cost the State $5.9 million in

fiscal 2004 plus lost interest and use of funds for carrying improper balances. A reliable

reconciliation system is an urgent need.



The department needs to explain its plan to develop or obtain a system that will enable it to

accurately and quickly reconcile its federal funds.





2. Jobs Services



A large part of what DLLR does is job service related. Through primarily two programs, the

Office of Employment Services and the Office of Employment Training, the fiscal 2005 allowance

provides $55.1 million in funding for job services programs. In addition to these major programs,

there are also smaller job service programs such as the Russian Immigrants Program. These

programs contain redundant functions and often provide overlapping services. In addition to the

many job service programs within DLLR, the Department of Human Resources offers a variety of



Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

16

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



State and federal funded job service programs. This presents a rather complex maze for the job

seeker and employer to navigate.



One example of the problems that DLLR faces is a failure to meet a deadline in the Welfare-to-

Work Program. The Welfare-to-Work Program failed to receive $5 million in federal fiscal 1999

matching funds because DLLR’s local grantees did not budget the pace of their spending in such a

way as to guarantee the matching grant would be allocated. The deadline to qualify for these funds

just recently passed. These types of problems can and should be avoided. By streamlining the

delivery of job services and knowing the target populations, problems can be avoided. DLLR

recognizes these problems and has begun the process of reorganizing its job services programs. The

abolition of the general funded skills based training for employment promotion program is an

example of one action DLLR has taken. However, it must be pointed out that since many of these

programs are federal funded, the federal government has placed certain restrictions and restraints on

how the funds may be used. This will limit DLLR’s ability to conduct wholesale revisions to the

programs but still allows flexibility to make some important changes.



In its response to the 2003 Joint Chairmen’s Report, the department briefly discussed the

reorganization of the Division of Employment and Training into two entities to help with services

delivery and fund management. DLLR should explain what other changes it is undertaking. The

department should also explain the impact of the deletion of the 17 filled positions and how all

these changes will improve services to the labor force and employers of Maryland, and how the

changes will provide for a more efficient use of resources.









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

17

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Recommended Actions



1. Add the following language:



, provided that $1,397,000 of this general fund appropriation is reduced contingent upon the

enactment of House Bill 144. Further provided that $434,000 of this general fund

appropriation is reduced contingent upon the enactment of House Bill 110.



Explanation: House Bill 144 would change the Real Estate Commission from a general

funded commission to a special funded commission. House Bill 110 would change the Board

of Public Accountancy from a general funded board to a special funded board.



Amount

Reduction



2. Reduce education expenses in the Office of $ 20,000 GF

Professional Licensing to fiscal 2004 working

appropriation level.



3. Reduce funding for the Russian Immigrant Program. 75,000 GF

The need for this program continues to wane. Since

the collapse of the Soviet bloc, the immigration from

the former republics has decreased. In fiscal 2003

records show that 412 clients were aided by the

programs these grants funds. In fiscal 2004 the

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation

reports that 185 clients are being helped. In both

years all the grant was exhausted which means that

the cost per client more than doubled in one year.



4. Reduce federal funds. The department has shown 2,998,000 FF

that it has significant difficulties managing its federal

funds. This reduction reduces the department’s

federal fund fiscal 2005 appropriation to

approximately the fiscal 2004 working appropriation.

The department may submit budget amendments for

the federal funds subject to the provision in section

24 subparagraph 3 of House Bill 200/Senate Bill 125

(the fiscal 2005 budget bill) which requires any

federal fund budget amendment in excess of

$100,000 must be accompanied by documentation

certifying that the funds are available.





Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

18

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



5. Delete over budgeted funds in the Unemployment 468,000 FF

Insurance Program. The department states that this

appropriation increase was made in error and should

be deleted.



Total Reductions $ 3,561,000



Total General Fund Reductions $ 95,000



Total Federal Fund Reductions $ 3,466,000









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

19

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Appendix 1





Current and Prior Year Budgets

Current and Prior Year Budgets

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation

($ in Thousands)



General Special Federal Reimb.

Fund Fund Fund Fund Total

Fiscal 2003

Legislative

Appropriation $29,351 $11,029 $151,765 $2,189 $194,333

Deficiency

Appropriation 0 0 0 0 0

Budget

Amendments 1,479 6,335 6,498 1,135 15,446

Cost Containment -1,618 0 0 0 -1,618

Reversions and

Cancellations -312 -5,011 -15,909 -1,417 -22,649

Actual

Expenditures $28,900 $12,353 $142,354 $1,906 $185,512



GWIB 230 31 73 499 833



Adjusted Total $29,131 $12,384 $142,426 $2,404 $186,345



Fiscal 2004

Legislative

Appropriation $20,011 $11,699 $135,713 $3,817 $171,240

Cost Containment -1,243 -6 0 -77 -1,326

Budget

Amendments 8,697 8,697

Working

Appropriation $18,769 $20,390 $135,713 $3,740 $178,611



Note: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.







Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

20

P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



Fiscal 2003

During the 2003 interim, the Governor’s Workforce Investment Board (GWIB) was transferred to

DLLR. As a result, the Department of Budget and Management made a retro-active adjustment to the

appropriation numbers so the inclusion of GWIB did not skew any increases and decreases. The

GWIB numbers are included in the fiscal 2004 working appropriation figures.



In fiscal 2003 DLLR had $6.3 million in special fund budget amendments. This amount is

primarily due to additional takeout revenue for the Racing Commission ($4.3 million) but also

includes the cost of professional exams for the Office of Professional Licensing ($1 million) and

several other smaller expenses. DLLR also reverted $5 million in special funds. This amount

includes $1.8 million for the Racing Bond Fund and $1.2 million for the Maryland Economic

Development Corporation. There is also a reversion related to Special Administrative Expense Fund

($800,000).



DLLR also had $6.5 million in federal fund budget amendments which were primarily federal

Reed Act (unemployment insurance-related) money that had accumulated since fiscal 1998 in small

amounts. DLLR decided to appropriate these funds in fiscal 2003. DLLR also had $15.9 million in

federal fund reversions. This amount includes reversions in the Welfare-to-Work Program

($6.8 million), UI Program ($5.7 million), and the Job Service Program ($2.4 million).



The fiscal 2004 special fund amendments are due to Chapter 277, Acts of 2003 which made the

five design boards within Occupational and Professional Licensing special funded.









Analysis of the FY 2005 Maryland Executive Budget, 2004

21

Object/Fund Difference Report

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



FY04

FY03 Working FY05 FY04 - FY05 Percent

Object/Fund Actual Appropriation Allowance Amount Change Change



Positions

01 Regular 1627.00 1519.05 1502.05 -17.00 -1.1%









P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation

02 Contractual 113.70 159.26 178.58 19.32 12.1%

Total Positions 1740.70 1678.31 1680.63 2.32 0.1%



Objects

01 Salaries and Wages $ 85,948,005 $ 84,807,141 $ 86,719,022 $ 1,911,881 2.3%

02 Technical & Spec Fees 4,799,679 4,655,506 4,818,389 162,883 3.5%

03 Communication 3,423,273 2,761,763 4,344,199 1,582,436 57.3%

04 Travel 877,747 1,208,343 1,266,180 57,837 4.8%

06 Fuel & Utilities 650,113 551,256 634,954 83,698 15.2%

07 Motor Vehicles 359,682 465,992 480,093 14,101 3.0%

08 Contractual Services 11,550,379 12,101,653 16,806,504 4,704,851 38.9%

22









09 Supplies & Materials 1,904,133 2,045,205 2,754,437 709,232 34.7%

10 Equip - Replacement 598,754 1,067,493 4,197,596 3,130,103 293.2%

11 Equip - Additional 490,737 237,187 2,057,017 1,819,830 767.3%

12 Grants, Subsidies, and Contracts 71,103,244 64,904,000 53,426,000 -11,478,000 -17.7%

13 Fixed Charges 3,235,372 3,805,643 3,329,706 -475,937 -12.5%

14 Land & Structures 1,403,859 0 72,263 72,263 N/A

Total Objects $ 186,344,977 $ 178,611,182 $ 180,906,360 $ 2,295,178 1.3%



Funds

01 General Fund $ 29,130,554 $ 18,768,534 $ 18,417,941 -$ 350,593 -1.9%

03 Special Fund 12,383,553 20,390,053 20,091,698 -298,355 -1.5%

05 Federal Fund 142,426,372 135,712,644 139,585,590 3,872,946 2.9%

09 Reimbursable Fund 2,404,498 3,739,951 2,811,131 -928,820 -24.8%



Total Funds $ 186,344,977 $ 178,611,182 $ 180,906,360 $ 2,295,178 1.3%









Appendix 2

Note: The fiscal 2004 appropriation does not include deficiencies, and the fiscal 2005 allowance does not reflect contingent reductions.

Fiscal Summary

Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation



FY04 FY04

FY03 Legislative Working FY03 - FY04 FY05 FY04 - FY05

Unit/Program Actual Appropriation Appropriation % Change Allowance % Change





0A Office of the Secretary $ 11,731,262 $ 17,384,079 $ 10,767,471 -8.2% $ 10,651,814 -1.1%









P00 – Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation

0B Division of Administration 15,667,966 0 17,023,000 8.6% 17,611,567 3.5%

0C Division of Financial Regulation 4,761,586 4,642,749 4,592,365 -3.6% 4,875,818 6.2%

0D Division of Labor And Industry 11,242,795 4,024,663 11,959,098 6.4% 12,670,105 5.9%

0E Division of Racing 10,751,598 10,599,859 10,513,546 -2.2% 8,234,253 -21.7%

0F Div. of Occupational & Professional Licensing 7,387,028 7,081,318 7,300,541 -1.2% 7,589,869 4.0%

0G Division of Workforce Development 76,485,169 126,770,877 77,067,163 0.8% 59,340,692 -23.0%

0H Division of Unemployment Insurance 48,317,573 0 39,387,998 -18.5% 59,932,242 52.2%



Total Expenditures $ 186,344,977 $ 170,503,545 $ 178,611,182 -4.2% $ 180,906,360 1.3%

23









General Fund $ 29,130,554 $ 19,807,079 $ 18,768,534 -35.6% $ 18,417,941 -1.9%

Special Fund 12,383,553 11,699,403 20,390,053 64.7% 20,091,698 -1.5%

Federal Fund 142,426,372 135,712,643 135,712,644 -4.7% 139,585,590 2.9%



Total Appropriations $ 183,940,479 $ 167,219,128 $ 174,871,231 -4.9% $ 178,095,229 1.8%





Reimbursable Fund $ 2,404,498 $ 3,284,417 $ 3,739,951 55.5% $ 2,811,131 -24.8%



Total Funds $ 186,344,977 $ 170,503,545 $ 178,611,182 -4.2% $ 180,906,360 1.3%



Note: The fiscal 2004 appropriation does not include deficiencies, and the fiscal 2005 allowance does not reflect contingent reductions.









Appendix 3


Other docs by winstongamso
2003-2004 Branch Campus (2000 Cohort)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Subcontractor Material Supplier Declaration
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
W10A00 - Maryland State Police[968]
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
RA01A - MSDE - State Library Resource Center
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Transportation Trust Fund Overview
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
ZA00G - MICUA - Columbia Union College
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Meetings & Minutes Minutes[277]
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!